AI-assisted teams outperform AI-led teams but not human-only teams in assessing research reproducibility in quantitative social science
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 123(22), e2524747123
Peer-reviewed publication
288 researchers in 103 teams reproduced published social science with no AI, AI assistance, or AI in the lead: human-only and AI-assisted teams reproduced 94% and 91% of results, AI-led teams only 37%.
Expert human judgment is still indispensable for verification — but a 37% autonomous rate suggests AI can help where human review doesn't scale.